Archives

Tags

  • 30Aug

    The publishers of the Oxford English Dictionary say that its unlikely the next edition will ever appear in printed form.

    The dictionary in question is the full-blown, multi volume edition rather than shorter versions. The second and current edition, published in 1989, runs to 21,500 pages and has just short of 300,000 entries.

    Work on the third edition has been underway since that time and is currently 28% complete, with entries from mahurat and rococoesque finished as of June this year. (Each completed batch is added to an online version at the OED site.)

    The reason editors started at M is because the sheer time it takes to produce the dictionary means that entries completed later on tend to be more accurate and current and, well, it seemed unfair that A should suffer again! To limit the effect, the editors switch focus every three months, alternating between working their way through entries alphabetically and concentrating on the most prominent words.

    The chief executive of publishers at Oxford University Press has now made headlines by saying he thinks a printed version of the third edition is unlikely, arguing that the market for printed dictionaries is currently collapsing.

    A spokeswoman for OUP later clarified that: “It’s likely to be more than a decade before the full edition is published and a decision on format will be taken at that point. Lexicographers are currently preparing the third edition of the OED, which is 28 per cent complete. No final completion date is yet confirmed.”

    When exactly the dictionary will appear is also a mystery. Based on the current pace of work, it wouldn’t be until 2064, though one writer has previously claimed the schedule is for somewhere around 2037.

    Either way, it’s clearly so far away that it’s impossible to predict how publishing will work at that point. If you assume the third edition will indeed be ready in 27 years, trying to imagine the form it will appear in is equivalent to somebody from 1983 (perhaps a WarGames viewer watching thermonuclear war averted with a game of tic-tac-toe) trying to imagine the Kindle.

    Related posts:

    1. “meh” gets into the Collins English Dictionary
    2. RSS in Plain English
    3. Language meets logic as computers mark English papers


  • 30Aug

    So you might have noticed I’ve got a little thing for the Middle Ages. Be it Arthur or Charlemagne, Margery Kempe or Marie de France, the period incorrectly referred to the Dark Ages has been a lifelong inspiration for me. In fact, I went through graduate school doing little else than perusing old manuscripts in Middle English and contemplating the motives of writers during that period.

    But as such, I’m a really hard person to please when it comes to movies and film. It’s not that I think that I’m the most renowned scholar out there; it’s just that I get really grumpy when Hollywood spends millions of dollars on a film and can’t even get armor or basic historic fact right. Yes, I nearly walked out of the last King Arthur film (and don’t even get me started on Keira Knightley’s “armor”) . Yes, I’ve been known to shout or throw things in frustration, and go on long rants. I’m a medieval geek, what can I say?

    However, sometimes I am pleasantly surprised. Just because I absolutely adored Ken Follett’s book, The Pillars of the Earth, didn’t guarantee that I’d like the series. So I wanted a little bit to start watching. I shouldn’t have worried at all, though, considering that Follett himself is quite involved in the show (and even guest-starred in an episode). What results is a medieval historical drama with as much intrigue as George R. R. Martin, stellar casting, inspired performances, and brilliant set and costume design. This makes me a very happy girl indeed.

    So, if you haven’t started watching it yet, and need some reasons to, here’s some food for thought.

    1 – The ease. It’s streaming on Netflix. Like, right now. Your XBox has approximately seven episodes (as of right now; there are a total of eight) of The Pillars of the Earth, waiting for you to watch them. You don’t have to rent it, you don’t have to subscribe to Starz. And if you’re like me, it’s likely you’ve exhausted much of your instant queue and are looking for something to keep your attention (one can only watch so much Veronica Mars, after all). If you’ve been waiting for a gripping story that takes time to develop characters and won’t cost you a penny, this is your ticket to happiness.

    2 – The history. The Pillars of the Earth is, on the surface anyway, about the building of a cathedral in the fictional town of Kingsbridge, England. And while that might not sound thrilling on a first glance, Follett’s story is so much more. The series is set during the political turmoil of the 12th century, when the crown of England was up for grabs after the sinking of the White Ship, killing a variety of heirs to the throne. The period is referred to as The Anarchy, or the Nineteen-Year Winter as King Stephen and Matilda of England—the named heiress to Henry I’s throne—battled, killed, and plotted their kingdom into near demise. But while the upper echelons of power are squabbling, Follett’s story also touches on the very real stories of very real people, including the prior of Kingsbridge, Philip, the builder of the cathedral, Tom, and their friends and family. The result is a broad view of life during the period, and the show does a bang-on job of showing just how duplicitous the nobility could be as well as how much the lower classes had to struggle to get by.

    3 – The setting. It’s no wonder that I’m so fond of D&D. As cheesy as RPGs can be, they do, by and large, take their inspiration from the Middle Ages. In the series, the set designers and builders—on location in Austria and Hungary—attended to a wealth of details. The result is a full-fledged environment that goes far beyond what we’ve learned to accept as passable medieval design (far and away better than any Renaissance Faire). It’s dirty, it’s muddy, sure—but it’s also astonishing. As the cathedral is built in Kingsbridge, it rises out of the bleak landscape, a magnificent pinnacle of man’s capabilities. Cathedrals still inspire wonder in people, hundreds of years after they were built. But watching the show really gives you a measure of just how astonishing such a feat was in its own time. Plus, there’s tons of swordfighting–well done, I should add–and a good share of sexiness, too.

    4 – The costumes. Medieval costuming is tricky, especially when considering the poorer classes. I mean, people didn’t have wardrobes worth of clothes. The poorer the characters on the show, the more often you see them wearing the same outfit time and time again. And even as time passes, the characters are still wearing elements of the same outfits. The more well-to-do folks, like Aliena during her successful turn as a merchant, get brighter colors and more interestingly cut garments. It’s those little details that truly speak volumes. And the costume designers aren’t afraid of dirt. Gone are the pristine medieval costumes of films like Camelot; when Aliena walks through town, the edges of her skirt get very dirty. As an added bonus, some of the costumes are quite simple–so if you’re looking for inspiration for an upcoming convention, there you go!

    5 – The cast. Ian McShane, first of all, as the corrupt and diabolical Bishop Waleran. If you are a die-hard Deadwood fan like me, you’re likely perfectly happy just to watch Ian McShane read the dictionary aloud. Especially if he does it with some swear words! Add to that mix Rufus Sewell as well as a host of other actors—those you’ve heard of and those you haven’t—and I can honestly say it’s one of the best casts I’ve seen on a show of this magnitude in a long time. While there are a few stray accents, over all the consistency is impressive. And performances from the younger cast are in now way eclipsed by the more veteran actors. You’ll even see Allison Pill, of Scott Pilgrim fame, as Matilda of England (a.k.a. Queen Maude).

    I could come up with a dozen more reasons you should take some time to watch this series, but five is probably enough to whet your appetite. What more is there to say? Great quality, great story, great actors. That’s not something we see much these days, in all truth!

    So take a chance, and go a little medieval this weekend.

    Related posts:

    1. Battlefield Earth Writer Apologizes for “Suckiest Movie Ever”
    2. Guédelon Castle – Reverse Engineering Medieval Archaeology in the 21st Century
    3. Did Lost Pull a Reverse George Lucas?


  • 30Aug

    So you might have noticed I’ve got a little thing for the Middle Ages. Be it Arthur or Charlemagne, Margery Kempe or Marie de France, the period incorrectly referred to the Dark Ages has been a lifelong inspiration for me. In fact, I went through graduate school doing little else than perusing old manuscripts in Middle English and contemplating the motives of writers during that period.

    But as such, I’m a really hard person to please when it comes to movies and film. It’s not that I think that I’m the most renowned scholar out there; it’s just that I get really grumpy when Hollywood spends millions of dollars on a film and can’t even get armor or basic historic fact right. Yes, I nearly walked out of the last King Arthur film (and don’t even get me started on Keira Knightley’s “armor”) . Yes, I’ve been known to shout or throw things in frustration, and go on long rants. I’m a medieval geek, what can I say?

    However, sometimes I am pleasantly surprised. Just because I absolutely adored Ken Follett’s book, The Pillars of the Earth, didn’t guarantee that I’d like the series. So I wanted a little bit to start watching. I shouldn’t have worried at all, though, considering that Follett himself is quite involved in the show (and even guest-starred in an episode). What results is a medieval historical drama with as much intrigue as George R. R. Martin, stellar casting, inspired performances, and brilliant set and costume design. This makes me a very happy girl indeed.

    So, if you haven’t started watching it yet, and need some reasons to, here’s some food for thought.

    1 – The ease. It’s streaming on Netflix. Like, right now. Your XBox has approximately seven episodes (as of right now; there are a total of eight) of The Pillars of the Earth, waiting for you to watch them. You don’t have to rent it, you don’t have to subscribe to Starz. And if you’re like me, it’s likely you’ve exhausted much of your instant queue and are looking for something to keep your attention (one can only watch so much Veronica Mars, after all). If you’ve been waiting for a gripping story that takes time to develop characters and won’t cost you a penny, this is your ticket to happiness.

    2 – The history. The Pillars of the Earth is, on the surface anyway, about the building of a cathedral in the fictional town of Kingsbridge, England. And while that might not sound thrilling on a first glance, Follett’s story is so much more. The series is set during the political turmoil of the 12th century, when the crown of England was up for grabs after the sinking of the White Ship, killing a variety of heirs to the throne. The period is referred to as The Anarchy, or the Nineteen-Year Winter as King Stephen and Matilda of England—the named heiress to Henry I’s throne—battled, killed, and plotted their kingdom into near demise. But while the upper echelons of power are squabbling, Follett’s story also touches on the very real stories of very real people, including the prior of Kingsbridge, Philip, the builder of the cathedral, Tom, and their friends and family. The result is a broad view of life during the period, and the show does a bang-on job of showing just how duplicitous the nobility could be as well as how much the lower classes had to struggle to get by.

    3 – The setting. It’s no wonder that I’m so fond of D&D. As cheesy as RPGs can be, they do, by and large, take their inspiration from the Middle Ages. In the series, the set designers and builders—on location in Austria and Hungary—attended to a wealth of details. The result is a full-fledged environment that goes far beyond what we’ve learned to accept as passable medieval design (far and away better than any Renaissance Faire). It’s dirty, it’s muddy, sure—but it’s also astonishing. As the cathedral is built in Kingsbridge, it rises out of the bleak landscape, a magnificent pinnacle of man’s capabilities. Cathedrals still inspire wonder in people, hundreds of years after they were built. But watching the show really gives you a measure of just how astonishing such a feat was in its own time. Plus, there’s tons of swordfighting–well done, I should add–and a good share of sexiness, too.

    4 – The costumes. Medieval costuming is tricky, especially when considering the poorer classes. I mean, people didn’t have wardrobes worth of clothes. The poorer the characters on the show, the more often you see them wearing the same outfit time and time again. And even as time passes, the characters are still wearing elements of the same outfits. The more well-to-do folks, like Aliena during her successful turn as a merchant, get brighter colors and more interestingly cut garments. It’s those little details that truly speak volumes. And the costume designers aren’t afraid of dirt. Gone are the pristine medieval costumes of films like Camelot; when Aliena walks through town, the edges of her skirt get very dirty. As an added bonus, some of the costumes are quite simple–so if you’re looking for inspiration for an upcoming convention, there you go!

    5 – The cast. Ian McShane, first of all, as the corrupt and diabolical Bishop Waleran. If you are a die-hard Deadwood fan like me, you’re likely perfectly happy just to watch Ian McShane read the dictionary aloud. Especially if he does it with some swear words! Add to that mix Rufus Sewell as well as a host of other actors—those you’ve heard of and those you haven’t—and I can honestly say it’s one of the best casts I’ve seen on a show of this magnitude in a long time. While there are a few stray accents, over all the consistency is impressive. And performances from the younger cast are in now way eclipsed by the more veteran actors. You’ll even see Allison Pill, of Scott Pilgrim fame, as Matilda of England (a.k.a. Queen Maude).

    I could come up with a dozen more reasons you should take some time to watch this series, but five is probably enough to whet your appetite. What more is there to say? Great quality, great story, great actors. That’s not something we see much these days, in all truth!

    So take a chance, and go a little medieval this weekend.

    Related posts:

    1. Battlefield Earth Writer Apologizes for “Suckiest Movie Ever”
    2. Guédelon Castle – Reverse Engineering Medieval Archaeology in the 21st Century
    3. Did Lost Pull a Reverse George Lucas?


  • 28Aug

    Typically my article ideas come from, you know, the Internet. But this morning I was reading a fascinating piece in the current issue of Wired that was so astonishing and so cool, I just had to share it with the Geeks Are Sexy crew. Thankfully Wired presents much of their magazine content online, and in this case, the article is quite enhanced in the digital version.

    So, here’s the basics of the story according to Wired. Two photographers in the early days of the art, Charles Fontayne and William Porter, snapped a shot of Cincinnati in 1848. That’s pre-Civil War, and remarkably early–not only in terms of technology, but considering the fact that the pieces are still around today. The process they used included a total of eight daguerreotype plated, and the resulting picture captured 2 miles of the waterfront, including steamships, industrial and commercial buildings, and glimpses into the daily life of the various Cincinnati inhabitants.

    But here’s where the process gets even cooler. Their methods produced an image so startlingly clear that, when the plates were taken for observation, it was determined that blowing up the image to 170 x 20 feet still wouldn’t compromise clarity. As Wired explains, “a digicam would have to record 140,000 megapixels per shot to match that.”

    As a result, the details presented in the photograph upon magnification are absolutely astounding, down to the time on the clocktower (which in the original is only 1mm wide, but can be read as 1:55pm when zoomed in). Some particularly interesting things to note include photo documentation of one of the first astronomical observatories, steamships, and free blacks who, according to the article, “were building a community in Cincinnati, just across the line from Kentucky slave country.”

    Daguerreotypes are an exercise of remarkable science, the process much more akin to strange alchemy than the method we’re familiar with today. The name comes from its inventor, Louis Daguerre. Components involved included mercury, silver, copper, and iodine vapor. The resulting image looks like a mirror if approached from the side, but produces magnificently detailed images with remarkable depth.

    Wired does a great job of explaining the tedious—and poisonous—process:

    Daguerreotypes start as copper plates with a thin, mirror-polished coating of silver that’s been exposed to halogen gas (iodine or bromine) to make silver halide. Light hitting this compound knocks an electron loose, which attaches to a silver ion, forming a neutral silver atom. The result is that all the places on the plate exposed to light are clusters of pure silver, and the rest is silver halide.

    Next, the exposed plate is held over a warm pool of mercury (don’t breathe!). The mercury combines with the silver atoms, creating the equivalent of a digital image’s pixel: a tiny “grain” between 150 and 800 nanometers in diameter that scatters light, making areas of the surface that were exposed to more light appear brighter. Finally, the plate is soaked in sodium thiosulfate, which washes away the unexposed silver halide, leaving dark regions — the image’s blacks and grays.

    So, while we carry cameras around with us every day, there is still something to be said for this lost art. As dangerous as the process is, the daguerreotype still provides a most remarkable image in a very low-tech, high-science kind of way. There’s something rather artful about that, and just so breathtaking considering the images as this one left behind. It offers us a literal window into a world that otherwise would be obscured and, in my mind and hopefully yours, instills a respect for the forefathers of the art of photography.

    Be sure to check out the interactive photograph at Wired, too. You can drag around the box and explore the details of the famed daguerreotype, picking up all of the clues left behind. It really is like going back in time, inasmuch as it’s possible. According to the article, there are plans to build an online interactive, zoomable version of the image soon. I can’t wait.

    [Photos: Top - via Wired, courtesy of the Public Library of Cincinnati and Hamilton County, Bottom - a daguerreotype camera circa 1839, in the pubic domain]

    Related posts:

    1. Harvard Physicist Alters The Speed Of Light
    2. Scientists see the light over knotty problem
    3. Green Geek’s Dream: Philips Master LED Light Bulb


  • 27Aug

    Had a bad day and need your ration of cute? Here’s Wicket from “Return of the Jedi,” in knitted stuffed animal form. This Wicket (and others like him) are called “Amigurumi,” which is the Japanese art of knitting or crocheting small stuffed animals.

    Our friends over at GeekDad pointed us to other geeky Amigurumi, including more StarWars characters, Harry Potter, Cthulhu, and others, on more than one occasion.

    Searching for other geeky Amigurumi on Google, I found this list on thedomesticscientist.com, which includes Mythbusters Amigurumi, Megaman Amigurumi, and more.

    Related posts:

    1. 10 geeky movies to show your kids
    2. New Harry Potter Trailer: Something for Fans to Nibble on While They Wait
    3. Expecto Awesome – New Photo from the Wizarding World of Harry Potter


  • 26Aug

    In a parallel universe, Belgian actor Patrick Bauchau played Captain Picard.

    I’m basing that claim on a 23 year old memo that surfaced, on Paramount letterhead, written by John Ferraro, who was then a young development executive in Paramount’s syndicated television division, to John Pike, president of Paramount’s TV division at the time.

    The memo, which has surfaced on the Letters of Note blog, lists the people who were being brought in to read for Gene Roddenberry in April 1987 for the various roles. Notably, Brent Spiner and Wil Wheaton weren’t even being considered for the roles at that time, and Wesley Snipes was being considered for the role of Geordi LaForge.

    Obviously, this was early in the casting process.

    [GAS] tracked down the author of the memo, John Ferraro, who had no idea the old memo had been leaked online.

    “It’s so funny! How did that memo surface, it’s been like, 25 years! That’s kind of crazy! Somebody obviously found it in somebody’s old file at the studio, I guess.”

    Ferraro mentioned that the letter might have simply been used to create a preliminary list of the types of actors that the series would go for – and was quick to point out that though he wrote the letter, he did not determine the names on the list.

    “Those weren’t my choices. It wasn’t like I was the one who put Wesley Snipes’ name on the list…. “

    “The casting director was bringing people in, and it looks like [at the time the memo was written] they were starting to pare things down and determine the people who would read for Gene [Roddenberry]”

    “It’s hard to explain to someone who hasn’t worked in the industry, but there’s sort of a hierarchy of the way it works on the executive side… I was pretty junior, and I was reporting to a guy named Rick Berman, who became the producer of the series… I was his guy who did a lot of the legwork. But I had been working in television for about five years at that point.”

    Ferraro worked on Star Trek through the production of the pilot, and possibly, he said, through the first couple of episodes. After that he moved to Paramount’s film division. Today, he’s working on producing other independent film projects.

    Related posts:

    1. Star Trek: TNG Theme Gets Lyrics
    2. Star Trek Icon Passes Away
    3. The New Star Trek Movie Blows Fans Away [Star Trek Review]


  • 24Aug

    It’s important to note that no one knows for sure if this actually comes from Mrs. Roosevelt, and the quote itself is often attributed to Admiral Hyman G. Rickover. Though Admiral Rickover was overhead speaking these words, he never claimed to be the original author, saying on the 28th November 1959′s edition of The Saturday Evening Post, that it came from an “unkown sage.”

    [Via]


  • 24Aug

    Starcraft Mashups

    How do you make Starcraft 2 even more awesome? Mash Final Fantasy 7 style gameplay and music into it, that’s how! Final Fantasy 0.2 is a Starcraft 2 mod that uses the Battlemap editor to create a radically different gameplay experience.

    Other radically different gameplay modes include a first person shooter, a 3rd person RPG and a wacky “Mario Kart” style race. It looks like Star Craft 2 is fertile ground for creative ideas.

    “This One Time At Boot Camp”

    If you’ve got 20 minutes to burn, then it’s worth it to listen to all the crazy things the units say in Star Craft 2, Unreality has the full set. Below are my favorites.

    “Attention Passengers, the local time..doesn’t matter since you’ll all be dead soon anyway” – Medivac

    “I’m sorry Commander, I’m afraid I can’t do that” – Raven

    “The white zone is for the immediate loading and unloading of passengers only” – Protoss Mothership

    StarCraft in Concert

    And finally, if you haven’t gotten enough StarCraft after all that, here’s a StarCraft medley performed by AdliB, which is made up of grad students of – what else, the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology.


  • 24Aug

    The British Defence Secretary has called on retailers to ban a forthcoming installment of Medal of Honor that allows players to control Taliban characters.

    The option is not available in the main game storyline, but rather the multiplayer online option in which one side can (and in fact must) play as the Taliban against US forces.

    Previous editions of the game have allowed players to control Axis characters in second world war scenarios, but this did not cause as much controversy.

    Speaking to the Sunday Times, Liam Fox, the British cabinet member responsible for military issues said ” At the hands of the Taliban, children have lost fathers and wives have lost husbands. I am disgusted and angry. It’s hard to believe any citizen of our country would wish to buy such a thoroughly un-British game. I would urge retailers to show their support for our armed forces and ban this tasteless product.”

    Fox also said he found it ” shocking that someone would think it acceptable to recreate the acts of the Taliban against British soldiers.” In fact this isn’t the case as British soldiers don’t feature in the game. A spokesperson for Fox later said this didn’t matter as the point remained that players could control Taliban characters in a setting where British troops operated.

    To date there does not appear to be any case of major retailers refusing to stock the game. (Fox’s suggestion that stores “ban” the game is of course meaningless as they don’t have such a power.)

    The organization that could have legally prevented the game being sold, the British Board of Film Classification, says it only restricted the game to buyers aged 18 or over to be cautious and had strongly considered allowing it to be sold to those aged 15 or over.

    The Department for Culture, Media and Sport, which is ultimately responsible for products such as video games, says Fox’s comments were in a personal capacity and that the rating system allows buyers to make informed purchasing decisions.

    In a comment issued before Fox spoke out, publishers Electronic Arts said ” We give gamers the opportunity to play both sides. Most of us have been doing this since we were seven. If someone’s the cop, someone’s got to be the robber, someone’s got to be the pirate, somebody’s got to be the alien. In Medal Of Honor multiplayer, someone has to be the Taliban.”


  • 23Aug

    When I was a kid, cheese was a no-no. Unlike the typical American family, the only cheese we had was of the soy variety; my mother was allergic, and my father just thought it wasn’t nutritious enough to be a mainstay in our refrigerator. So, in those rare visits to family members, especially during the holidays, I became enamored of cheese—the variety, the textures, the flavors, the applications. When I was old enough to purchase cheese of my own volition, I made it a personal goal of mine to experience as many cheeses as possible.

    You’d think that I’d be tired of cheese, but that’s far from the truth. In fact, the more I think I know about cheese, the more I discover what I don’t know. One of my son’s first foods was goat cheese, followed by Jarlsberg; now his favorite is Dubliner. At four he’s already sampled more cheese varieties than I did by the time I was eighteen. I consider that a definite leg up on life in general. He’s also fearless when it comes to tasting cheese, and considering the many varieties–and sometimes tongue-numbing curious flavors in the cheese realm–that will come in handy as he grows up.

    And the particularly good news is that, when eaten in moderation of course, cheese is good for you. Chock full of protein, calcium, phosphorous, and fat, it’s a great snack to keep you from eating junk food and a compliment to a myriad dishes. Cheese has been consumed around the world for thousands of years because of its longevity and nutritional benefit. Eat up! Think of it as part of your world heritage.

    So in the spirit of all things cheese, I thought I’d share some of my favorite cheeses, sprinkled with some interesting facts and notes that might help you the next time you want to venture into this culinary Eden. Or should I say, culinary Edam?

    Brie – This is the smooth, sultry sister in the cheese family. Brie, originally named for the now renamed provence of its origin, is a soft cheese, pale in color, with a distinctive hard “mouldy” rind that can be consumed. You most often see it served with crackers, sort of slathered on top, and its got a very distinctive flavor—sometimes it can be very mild, but it can have quite a bite depending on the individual process. Two bacterium are responsible for the flavor and texture of brie, which is typically made of cow’s milk or goat’s milk, depending on the recipe: Penicillium candidum or Penicillium camemberti and/or Brevibacterium linens. Personally, I like Brie straight up; just a slice will suffice. But it’s divine wrapped in phyllo and baked, spread on a sandwich in lieu of mayonnaise, or melted over a prime piece of steak.

    Jarlsberg – According to Wikipedia, Jarlsberg can be traced back to the 1850s, and it’s called after its namesake, Jarlsberg, Norway. With curious little holes throughout, it’s a mild cheese, somewhat similar to Swiss but with a lot more flavor. But just because the recipe is relatively old, doesn’t mean there isn’t a lot of planning and science behind Jarlsberg. In fact, today’s Jarlsberg is the result of research by the Dairy Institute at the Agricultural University of Norway, and that recipe has been used since the 1960s. Who says cheese has to have a rustic pedigree to be perfect? Jarlsberg is one of my favorite all-purpose cheeses; it melts beautifully, compliments any sandwich, and is perfect for snacking.

    Dubliner – Dubliner cheese might be named after the famed city, but it’s made in County Cork. Still, this mature cheese (called as such since it spends over a year aging) takes taste and texture to another level. It’s got a bright flavor, and is often interspersed with calcium lactate crystals amidst the pressed curds. The result is a subtle crunch. If you want to make some killer quiche, Dubliner adds depth of flavor and smoothness. Or grate some over your morning eggs. Marvelous!

    Wensleydale – Prefered by cheese connoisseur Wallace as well, Wensleydale is the perfect confluence of creamy and tasty—similar to blue cheese in texture but without well, that stink (which I happen to addore). Wenslydale is also rather crumbly, partly due to its relatively short aging time (3-6 months). There are a variety of Wensleydale cheeses, but they are all produced in the town of Hawes, found in Wensleydale, North Yorkshire, England. And although it has an English name, this famed cheese has got a French pedigree: in fact, it was first made by French Cistercian monks who arrived from the Roquefort region (another famous cheese place) in the early medieval period. By the 14th century the cheese was no longer made with sheep’s milk, and was made with the cow’s milk. Particular varieties include Wensleydale with cranberries and, one of my favorites, with apricots. Crumble it on salads, spread it on a cracker, or just place it directly in your mouth; you can’t go wrong with this wondrous cheese, Gromit, cheese!

    Halloumi – If you’re interested in grilling something other than meat this summer, consider some halloumi cheese. Yes, that’s right. You can grill this cheese without worrying about melting all over the grates. Originating in Cyprus, halloumi dates from the Middle Ages, as well. While it’s often compared to mozzarella in terms of texture and appearance, it has a much higher melting point. You can get it nice and brown on the grill or the skillet, and garnish it in a variety of ways. The reason the melting point is so high is due to its curds being heated before being shaped and brined. Another similar cheese is Egyptian hâlûm, which can be found infested with fly larva to enhance flavor. Personally I’m quite happy to eat my cheese without any living interruption—you know, other than what I can’t see with my naked eye. Still, halloumi is great for vegetarians feeling lonely at the grill, though it tends to be a little expensive.

    If you’re a little worried about trying cheeses, or buying them before knowing if you’ll like it, make friends with your local cheesemonger. Even large natural food stores like Whole Foods and Earth Fare typically have staff members well-versed in the language of cheese. Costco has a great selection, too, and often has samples for you to see for yourself–not to mention satisfaction guaranteed. You can always return it if it doesn’t work out!

    So, I’ve shared my my top five cheeses. What are your favorite cheeses? Know any particularly geeky cheese facts? Have you ever tried a really wacky cheese? Do you live in an area of the world that makes particularly intriguing cheeses? I’m always on the lookout to learn more!

    [Via Wikipedia]

    [Image: Guillaume Paumier / Wikimedia Commons, CC-by-sa-3.0]