Archives

Tags

  • 12May

    I’ve become somewhat spoiled in recent years spending much of my time on college campuses where there’s wireless, well, everywhere – and it’s fast, too. Though come to think of it, that’s not that unusual anymore – it used to be that only coffee shops and bookstores had wireless access, but now you see it at a lot of random places like fast food restaurants and department stores. And even some places that used to charge ridiculous amounts for access (Borders and Starbucks come to mind!) have free wireless now.

    My laptop is pretty much glued to my hip, along with my phone, and so if I could tether to my phone’s wifi that would actually be kind of awesome. Because whereas I can use my phone to do a lot, it certainly has its limitations. I actually had a situation recently where I got a phone call from work while I was driving asking if I could do something very quickly – and I said I could, as I’d be home in about half an hour. Of course then I got stuck in insane traffic and watched that half hour squeeze its way into a whole hour. If I could have pulled over into the nearest parking lot and been able to get online on my laptop, I probably would have. Honestly, this is probably one of the main reasons I would consider switching to a phone that allows tethering.

    And of course we all have so many different wifi-enabled devices now that being able to connect more than one to our phone would be pretty handy – not just for the purpose of Internet access, but to share among devices. You could even connect your phone to your gaming console.

    So do you think that being able to connect basically whatever you wanted to your phone would change things? If you could connect up to 5 devices at a time using just your mobile phone, how would that change how and when you access the Internet?

    Related posts:

    1. Sansa Connect: I Want One
    2. T-Mobile’s Change of Heart
    3. Landline phone use falling in favor of mobile phones


  • 21Apr

    style="margin-left: 15px" src="http://geeksaresexy.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/flashiphone.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="300" align="right" />Apple says it is formally abandoning attempts to bring Flash to the iPhone, and Adobe, on its side, says open platforms such as Flash will eventually win out over Apple’s closed platform.

    The change in policy is said to be the result of a new clause in Apple’s iPhone app license which Adobe believes to mean that Apple could reject or remove any apps created with Flash.

    That’s led Adobe to give up on a tool which allows app developers who use Flash to easily set up their apps to run on the iPhone platform. According to href="http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2010/04/20/on-adobe-flash-cs5-and-iphone-applications/">Mike Chambers, the “platform product manager” for Flash, Adobe’s work on the tool has not been in vain. He said it proved “there is no technical reason that Flash can’t run on the iPhone” and that “developers can create well performing and compelling content for the device”.

    The tool will remain available, but Adobe isn’t planning “additional investments in that feature”, a statement that appears to relate to time and effort as much as money.

    Chambers also argues that the work Adobe carried out on the tool has taught them lessons and technical approaches which can easily be applied to other devices and systems. He is also quite clear about his attitude to Apple’s policy:

    The primary goal of Flash has always been to enable cross browser, platform and device development. The cool web game that you build can easily be targeted and deployed to multiple platforms and devices. However, this is the exact opposite of what Apple wants.

    According to Chambers, he’ll now put more effort into how Flash can be used on Android devices. He also gives several examples of app developers who’ve begun work on Flash-based iPhone apps and have now switched their focus to Android.

    And Chambers also questions whether Apple’s strategy will pay off: “I believe that ultimately open platforms will win out over the type of closed, locked down platform that Apple is trying to create.”

    Related posts:

    1. href='http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/08/12/gr-apple-fest-is-on-in-the-mobile-industry/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Gr-apple-fest is on in the Mobile Industry!'>Gr-apple-fest is on in the Mobile Industry!
    2. href='http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/12/15/android-hits-20000-apps-doubles-output-in-last-five-months/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Android Hits 20,000 Apps; Doubles Output in Last Five Months'>Android Hits 20,000 Apps; Doubles Output in Last Five Months
    3. href='http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/03/12/apple-to-release-a-flash-based-notebook/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Apple to Release Flash-Based Notebook?'>Apple to Release Flash-Based Notebook?



    • Share/Bookmark
  • 13Apr

    Opera has become the first rival browser to Safari to appear on the iPhone and iPod touch. The app was approved last night and is already available for download.

    It’s something of a surprise that Apple would give the thumbs up to Opera. While the iTunes App Store approval process has often seemed close to random, one constant was that the firm turned down anything which could be argued to replicate a feature offered by Apple itself.

    As far as the specs go, Opera (or rather Opera Mini) has some notable advantages: it allows searching within a web page, saving of pages, and turning off images to increase load speed (and cut mobile data use). In theory, too, it also works quicker than Safari as the system compresses pages on the server and only the “lighter” version is sent to the device.

    In practice though, in the brief time I’ve spent using it, these don’t translate into an advantage with the factor that really defines Apple’s portable products: how it feels. I’ve not even thought of using any of these features in the past: whether that’s because they really aren’t necessary to my mobile use, or if I’ve just not used them because they aren’t there, it’s hard to say.

    To me, though, there are four main reasons why I would want to ditch any browser:

    1. It isn’t stable and reliable.
    2. It’s a security risk.
    3. It doesn’t work smoothly and intuitively.
    4. It feels too slow.

    The problem for Opera is that none of these really apply to Safari on mobile devices. So while Opera may very well be objectively equal to, or better than, Safari, it isn’t really filling a perceived gap.

    Where Opera might make a tangible difference is on 3G connections, particularly in areas with poor service. In such situations it could be that the speed advantages over Safari are much more pronounced.

    This isn’t the first “victory” Opera has had over larger rivals. It was the main complainant that prompted a European Union investigation into Microsoft’s bundling of Internet Explorer with Windows. That led to an ongoing program by which all European IE users are being greeted with a one-off on-screen prompt asking them to specifically choose one or more of the 12 leading browsers on the continent. While its market share hasn’t noticeably gone up yet, Opera claims it has seen a dramatic rise in downloads as a result.

    Related posts:

    1. Opera Strives for a Bigger Chuck of the American Market
    2. Opera to reinvent the web – web waits for fat lady to sing
    3. iPhone App Vetting Still a Lottery


  • 01Mar

    In the wake of the Tiger Woods scandals, a new iPhone app named TigerText allows you to send and receive text messages which can’t be traced later on. Or at least that’s how the story goes, but that story isn’t quite accurate.

    The app doesn’t actually involve sending SMS messages over the phone network. Instead, the messages are sent exclusively through the app itself, meaning both the sender and recipient must install the software to get them. (The app itself is free and includes up to 100 messages in the first 15 days. After that the sender pays $1.50 for 250 messages or $2.50 for unlimited messaging.)

    Of course, adulterous spouses could buy a package of messages for their secret lover, though whether that will be seen as a sweeping romantic gesture may be open to question.

    The message never actually exists as such on the recipient’s phone. Instead, it is stored on the servers of the company running the service. They automatically wipe it after a time set by the sender, ranging from one minute to five days. After, this it becomes completely inaccessible, so if either the sender or the recipient wants to look back longingly at it later, they’ll have to take a photograph of the screen.

    The theory is that even if it’s by legal action, the company would be unable to hand over any details of messages as the records would no longer exist. It does keep call records (who sent a message to who and at what time) by default, though these can also be set to be automatically wiped.

    It’ll be interesting to see how this theory is tested in the event that people use the app to cover crimes of more interest than adultery to the authorities. Certainly an ISP that took a similar approach to e-mails wouldn’t find itself too popular with the security services.

    The creator of the app told Time that the name of the app had been chosen before the Woods stories broke and that it is just coincidental. (He doesn’t explain where the name did come from, though a company FAQ says it is because tigers are difficult to track and also that it launches in the Chinese year of the tiger.)

    He also explains that the motivation of the app is to increase privacy and allow users more leeway when they text something they later regret and would prefer there was no record.

    Android and BlackBerry editions are in the works.

    Related posts:

    1. It’s time to get rid of email
    2. iPhone OS 3.0 allows iPorn in your pocket
    3. Coming soon: Grand Theft iPhone


  • 17Feb

    Here’s yet another Verizon commercial taking a shot at AT&T’s coverage. A spoof of Twilight, this one suggests that you might just lose the eternal love of your vampire soulmate if your download speeds aren’t fast enough.

    But I think the real issue here is this new twist on the vampire/werewolf debate. Is Verizon suggesting that wolves are less tech-savvy than vampires? Or maybe werewolves are just less shallow, able to look beyond how (blood) red your cellphone coverage map is.

    Related posts:

    1. AT&T versus Verizon: There’s a Lawsuit for That.
    2. New Verizon Commercial Spoofs iPhone Ad: “There’s a map for that.”
    3. Verizon Distributes Anti-iPhone Propaganda to Employees



    • Share/Bookmark
  • 16Feb

    Fans of style, beauty and multi-function convergence should be warned that this article may not make for pretty reading. But thanks to a range of gadgets, it is indeed possible in some circumstances to get most of the functionality of an iPhone at a far lower cost.

    For this exercise, the idea is to still wind up running an iPod/iPhone based system. Obviously if you aren’t set on the Apple experience, there are plenty of lower-cost smartphone alternatives such as Google’s recently released Nexus One.

    (The examples and costs given here are from the United Kingdom. The feasibility and economy of these solutions will vary elsewhere and may not save as much cash.)

    The first step is to thinking of the iPhone not as one device, but as many tools: it’s an iPod which has wireless internet access, makes phone calls and takes pictures. With that in mind the possible solutions become easier.

    1) The iPod

    That’s a simple enough solution. An iPod touch with some form of internet connection is pretty much the iPhone without the phone.

    2) Wireless internet

    If you don’t travel too much or if most of your time outside the house is in city centers where coffee shop Wi-Fi abounds, you’ll probably get most of the net access you need. But to truly mirror the iPhone, we need net access everywhere. That’s where the Mi-Fi comes in.

    The Mi-Fi is a small device which picks up mobile broadband anywhere with a suitable phone signal. Unlike a mobile broadband dongle, however, it doesn’t plug into a device. Instead it broadcasts a Wi-Fi signal which can be picked up by any suitable device, including of course the iPod touch. (There’s password protection to prevent other people stealing your signal.) In effect, it’s like having a wireless router in your pocket.

    The pricing system works on the same lines as most mobile broadband with combinations of a purchase price and then pay-as-you-go, or monthly subscription deals which either reduce the purchase price or get you it without charge. Data allowances go up to 5GB a month, which is pretty much the most you can use on most iPhone deals without the networks getting antsy.

    Because the Mi-Fi also works with other devices (or even up to five at once), it could also serve as a back-up in case you can’t get internet access for a laptop while on the road, or even for emergencies if your home broadband goes down. Because of the data allowance limits, however, it’s not really viable as a permanent broadband solution for a full-size PC.

    MiFi, and similar systems, is available in several countries. Unfortunately pricing varies greatly and means you won’t always be able to make major savings over simply having an iPhone.

    3) Phone calls

    There are two options here. One is to replace the standard earphones on your iPod Touch with a set featuring a built-in microphone. You can then run the Skype app to make and receive calls at low rates as long as you have some form of internet access (either a Wi-Fi connection or Midi.) There are a few major disadvantages though: to receive calls you’ll need a premium service called Skypeln, and the iPod touch will have to be switched on with the Skype app running at all times, which will reduce battery life. You’ll also not be able to make emergency calls.

    Option two is, of course, a cellphone. Given your other gadgets, all you need is a phone which makes and receives calls and texts. There are several phones which do this (and this alone) that are aimed at the elderly, complete with oversized keys, though these tend to be surprisingly expensive.

    A better choice is a handset such as the VX1. Sold by British supermarket giant Tesco (imagine Wal-Mart with as many outlets as McDonald’s), it costs just £18.99 (under $30) and was surprisingly the chain’s top-selling handset last Christmas. It turned out many people were buying it for the party season to use rather than risk damaging or losing an expensive smartphone while under the influence.

    The phone is roughly the size of a credit card and barely a centimeter thick, and works with any SIM card from any network and any tariff. It makes and receives calls and texts, and that’s it.

    4) Camera

    This is where things fall apart. If having a camera is important to you, there are three possible alternatives in the no-iPhone plan, all with major drawbacks. A simple digital camera matching the 2 or 3 megapixels of the iPhone is cheap enough, but pretty bulky. Slimline cameras (as little as 0.63″ thick) are available but cost so much they take a serious chunk out of any savings.

    Also, in either of these cases, you won’t be able to send picture or video messages. In theory you also can’t upload pictures there and then to services such as Flickr. I say “in theory” as uber-geeks may be able to figure out a way to use an iPhone-mini USB adaptor to hook the iPod touch up to the phone, jailbreak the iPod, then create some method of getting the photos online.

    Option three would be to replace the VX1 with a small cameraphone. This loses a little elegance, and in most cases ties you to a particular network/tariff, but it would do the trick.

    Putting it all together

    Unlike the iPhone, these schemes do not give you a sleek, streamlined all-in-one device. However, things aren’t quite as bad as they seem. By definition, the MiFi does not have to be in the same pocket as your other devices, and there’s certainly an argument that your crotch might be the last place you want to keep a wireless transmitter. So if you carry a bag you can keep it in there, or you could also put it in a different pocket if combat pants are your thing.

    As for the cameraphone (or phone and camera) and iPod touch, you can just keep them separately loose in your pocket. If you want an “all-in-one” device, it wouldn’t take too much creativity to modify an iPod protective case to sport a pouch on the cover to hold the phone (and perhaps even the MiFi too). If you’re really not bothered about your public image, you could even use Velcro to secure the phone to the case and then just hold the whole thing up to your ear when you make a call.

    However you set things up, to give you an idea of the change in bulk: the total height and width of the various devices will be no greater than the iPhone. Including the MiFi and the smallest cameraphone I could find, the depth will increase from 12.3mm on the iPhone to a total of 30.4mm, while the overall weight goes up from 135g to 304g.

    Some drawbacks and a bonus

    • Whatever combination of devices you use, it’s not going to look pretty and it’s not going to be as compact. How important that is depends on your personal style and the size of your pockets. (On the upside, it won’t be as clunky as the MEGATRON.)
    • iPhone apps which use the phone’s camera won’t be accessible. There aren’t that many available yet, but it’s an area with some possibilities.
    • While you’ll have more devices and more battery demands, you won’t need everything switched on all the time. Depending on your phone, you may require less charging than with an iPhone.

    The bottom line

    The potential savings depend on your choice of devices and how many calls you make: the variety of deals and prices is immense. As a general rule, the main potential for savings is that most iPhone deals come with huge monthly call/text allowances which some users won’t need.

    Here are some example based on UK tariffs, all of them comparing the total price over two years, winding up owning the various devices outright, and using the latest available 32GB iPhone/iPod Touch:

    iPhone packages vary, but the total amount you’ll wind up paying to own the device works out suspiciously similarly across all deals and networks. Taking a 32GB 3GS, on the lowest monthly allowance (600 minutes, 500 texts and “unlimited” data) on a two year deal with the phone costing £179, totaling £1019 (US $1,595).

    To get the same allowances with the iPod Touch/MiFi/cameraphone option (assuming the iPhone’s unlimited net allowance is practically equivalent to a 5GB limit) would cost £1479 (US $2,316) — a more expensive proposition.

    If you don’t make that many calls and you can cope with a £10 a month deal giving you 100 minutes and 100 texts, you can cut that total to £999 (US $1,564). In this case, of course, most people would pay an extra thirty bucks to get the iPhone.

    If you’re a very light user and prefer to pay for calls and texts as you use them, things change. On a pay-as-you go deal, the iPhone is £549 which includes free internet for a year, then £10 a month, making the two year total £669 (US$1,047) plus call and text charges.

    Going for the separate devices, the best overall price on a 5GB data deal would be £628 (US$983) plus call and text charges, a modest saving. (This option might, however, be very good value if you already use mobile broadband on a laptop and could replace it with the MiFi.)

    If, however, you can keep the data use under 1 GB a month (which, remember, only covers times when you can’t find a wireless network need to fall back on MiFi), then the cost falls to £450 ($704). Across the two years, that’s a third off the price of an iPhone.

    So at the moment, people who want the potential of an iPhone (an iPod and phone with internet access anywhere) but won’t need to make heavy use of all it features could indeed make some sizable savings, albeit at the expense of style and an uncluttered pocket. Those who also want mobile broadband for a laptop could also make savings.

    But for those who use a lot of data on the move, or need to make a lot of calls then, until deals such as MiFi become cheaper, the iPhone is still the best option if you want to join the Apple universe.

    Related posts:

    1. Dodgy cellphone signal? Plug in your own mast!
    2. Next-gen iPhone rumors include FM broadcasting and video editing
    3. Apple coding hides mystery device



    • Share/Bookmark
  • 06Jan

    By Jimmy Rogers (@me)
    Contributing Writer, [GAS]

    Google Nexus One

    While news of this device leaked quite a while ago (and Google openly distributed it to their employees), the Google Nexus One still drew a crowd today, both online and at Google’s official launch event.  The new phone is similar to other Android devices, such as the popular Droid, but this one has been custom built by the Google engineers themselves.

    There are several good resources out there already, most notably gdgt’s liveblog of today’s event and Engadget’s exclusive review of the Nexus One.  Also, Google has a dedicated product page over at google.com/phone.  All that withstanding, you, the lazy GAS reader, are probably too busy watching our funny videos to sift through those massive pages, so we have parsed out the most important highlights.

    First of all, let’s get some specs:

    • The device is both slim and light, as demonstrated in this slide at the launch event:

    • Screen size: 3.7-inch (diagonal) widescreen WVGA AMOLED touchscreen
    • Camera: 5 megapixels, LED flash, geotagging, video capture at 20fps
    • Wireless Specs:
      • UMTS Band 1/4/8 (2100/AWS/900)
      • HSDPA 7.2Mbps
      • HSUPA 2Mbps
      • GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)
      • Wi-Fi (802.11b/g/n)
      • Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR
      • A2DP stereo Bluetooth
    • Battery Life: It has a removable battery - check out the specs page for battery life under different conditions
    • OS: Android Mobile Technology Platform 2.1 (Eclair)
    • Storage:
      • 512MB Flash
      • 512MB RAM
      • 4GB Micro SD Card (Expandable to 32 GB)
    • Location Tech: AGPS, cell tower and wifi location, digital compass, accelerometer

    Ok, with specs out of the way, what’s next?  Well it uses the Android 2.1 platform at the moment (though future revs will bring new features like expandable SD storage).  That means it is very “open” and will allow a great number of applications to be developed for it.  In fact, I personally expect the Android app store to dwarf the iPhone app store, sheerly by wooing more developers with its openness.

    Based on the various wireless technologies in the Nexus One, the current available carriers are T-mobile (which is selling it subsidized already at $179), Verizon, and Vodafone (in Europe).  Also, you can buy it unsubsidized directly from Google for $529, shipping today!

    Without direct access to the phone it’s hard to say too much more.  For further reading, I suggest the hands-on review by Engadget and the latter part of the live gdgt feed, where the launch team answered some questions by the press.

    What do you think of the Google Nexus One?  Will you buy it?  Does it compete with other smartphones you have/want?  Post below in the comments!

    [Images from Google, Engadget, and gdgt (links above)]

    Related posts:

    1. Google Android phone launch delayed
    2. Google rumor has promising sound
    3. Google Calendar on your mobile phone with GCalSync


  • 18Dec

    Julius GenachowskiThe Federal Communications Commission has unveiled some of its ideas for strengthening the US broadband network to help the economy. The changes could include subsidies to improve provision in rural areas, measures to improve accessibility for people with disabilities, and a one-box solution to rival cable and video-on-demand services.

    The report issued this week (PDF file) is only a preliminary set of ideas and is designed to promote discussion. The final plan is to be published in February and will detail how the FCC intends to use funding provided for broadband from the economic stimulus package passed earlier this year.

    One of the main proposals is for the government to build broadband networks in areas where current providers don’t think it is profitable to do so. Under the plan, the money for this would come from the Universal Service Fund. This money, which comes from a levy on phone lines, is currently used to ensure everyone in the country has access to phone service.

    The plan also deals with disability issues when accessing internet services, though it appears this will be merely through promoting better designed websites and more equipment such as screenreaders, rather than any legal changes or increased funding.

    There may also be more details available to customers about the performance of rival broadband providers, the idea being that this will increase the likelihood that people will jump ship to get the best service.

    Another goal is to finally settle an ongoing debate about the best way to use the wireless spectrum. This could involve reallocating the frequencies used by TV broadcasters where wireless internet services could use the space more efficiently. It could also mean finding ways to take advantage of currently unused “white noise” between frequencies which are already allocated.

    Perhaps the most radical measure is to overhaul the way people get set-top boxes. At the moment most viewers either rent a box from a cable or satellite provider or receive it free with their subscription. The FCC believes this provides no incentive for manufacturers to produce better quality boxes with innovative features. Its proposal is to force all service providers (including those offering video-on-demand) to make their technology available so that firms can produce and sell boxes which are compatible with all TV and internet services.

    FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski (pictured) said reaching the plan’s aims would be a taunting task: “But its difficulty merely increases the urgency of advancing now toward our ultimate goal of creating a ubiquitous broadband infrastructure that addresses the growing costs of digital exclusion and that will allow every American to enjoy the extraordinary benefits that high-speed Internet access can provide.”

    Related posts:

    1. FCC boss tackling broadband shortfall and mobile competition
    2. 4G mobile broadband becomes a reality
    3. Broadband prices and take-up both on the rise


  • 14Dec

    Samsung 4g Dongle

    A Swedish firm has become the first to offer 4G mobile broadband services for consumers. But the service has been described as a “killer user experience” rather than a “killer app”.

    The service from TeliaSonera AB will debut in the next few months, initially in Stockholm, Sweden and Oslo, Norway, extending it across the two countries throughout the year. At launch there won’t be any compatible handsets: the service will instead be available for laptops via a dedicated USB dongle produced by Samsung.

    In theory, 4G broadband could reach up to 100 megabits per second. That’s 12.5 MBps, which would be classed as a decent fixed-line broadband speed in most places in the world.

    The main note of caution for would-be 4G users is that it there aren’t any imminent changes in what you can do with the technology compared with 3G, beyond simple increasing speed. With the 2G to 3G leap, several features became credible options, most notably streaming video and even video messaging. The change from 3G to 4G theoretically allows better resolution video to be streamed, but that’s going to make little noticeable difference on existing handset screens. Of course, on laptops it’s a different story and means watching live TV on the move without squinting could become viable.

    The features most likely to benefit from 4G may include videoconferencing for multiple participants and better quality online gaming. However, the market is probably at the chicken-and-egg stage with developers hesitant to put too much effort into applications until there is a sizeable enough user base, and users unwilling to upgrade until there are more benefits to doing so.

    Another important issue in the 4G market’s development is how networks manage demand. Getting data ten times as quickly isn’t much more attractive if customers are still subject to tight constraints on monthly data use. But without such limits, some users will inevitably push the network’s capacity to its limit.

    Early adoption of the technology may also be limited by the fact that the 4G dongle doesn’t cover 3G reception, meaning that anyone who may leave the 4G coverage area will need two dongles. A dual-format dongle won’t be available until the middle of 2010.

    To hook new customers, the firm is offering free modems for the first six months, along with a trial price of just 4 kroner (approximately 56 US cents) a month. In July, the price will then rise to its standard cost of 500 kroner ($70) a month. While that’s theoretically a great way of letting people become dependent on the service and paying up later rather than returning to the slower speeds, there is the possibility that the 4G network will become overloaded if too many people sign up for the offer.

    Related posts:

    1. FCC boss tackling broadband shortfall and mobile competition
    2. Broadband prices and take-up both on the rise
    3. Brits hit with special tax to pay for broadband


  • 23Nov

    So remember the Verizon “there’s a map for that” commercial that first aired during Monday Night Football last month? It only took a few weeks for AT&T to take legal action, claiming that the ad was misleading to the point of deceptive trade practice.

    Their complaint? Not that the spotty AT&T 3G coverage map (which featured a vast amount of white space compared to the map for Verizon) was inaccurate, but that it implied that there was no cellular coverage in those areas at all. In other words, it was an issue of perception rather than technicalities – and as we all know, the law loves technicalities, so it’s not surprising that an Atlanta federal judge has already denied AT&T’s request for an injunction that would yank the ads.

    In the meantime, Verizon’s new ads are airing just in time for the holiday shopping season. It looks like poor iPhone has been shipped off to the Island of Misfit Toys, thanks to that spotty map.

    Related posts:

    1. New Verizon Commercial Spoofs iPhone Ad: “There’s a map for that.”
    2. Verizon Distributes Anti-iPhone Propaganda to Employees
    3. New Verizon Scifi-ish Ad Promotes Motorola’s DROID